I’ve been spending my time in recent weeks listening to and speaking about systems change. I have been asked to consider new ways to do business and I have been asking others to do the same. All of this activity involves the delivery of human services and much of it involves public policy. Meanwhile, seemingly endless political messages permeate daily life and frequently touch on issues involving public policy.
This week, I met with a small faith community and our topic of discussion was, “Have You Reached A Verdict?” The focus was on justice and how we as individuals make judgments. Our directed discussion included some questions to ponder, such as recalling a time when we had been unfair in our judgments, when we let our own bias interfere with the evidence, or when we withheld judgment and later found that we had, in fact, changed our thinking.
As I pondered these ideas and tried to be brutally honest in my self-assessment, I had to admit that I am quick to judge and frequently do so based on my own personal bias. Further, it seems that our “sound-bite” culture encourages this type of response. Thinking this through, it seems that most of the time, these judgments tend toward the negative – it’s easier to be against something unknown, after all, than to be an advocate for something about which we have limited knowledge.
If we want to improve conditions, but are negative about all “new” ideas, how, then do we affect change? Further, in a society with limited resources, how do we make prudent, compassionate decisions, especially if those decisions may conflict with our own self interest or our own notions of how things ought to be?
It seems to me as I reflect on recent discussions about United Way’s Community Access Network (CAN), Indiana’s Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) Eligibility Modernization (V-CAN), and the Healthy Indiana Plan, that this message to take time to make prudent judgments is quite timely. I have been in many gatherings these past weeks that discuss these new systems. Most of the questions I have heard express fear that those systems may not deliver the hoped-for results. At the same time, the success of these same programs depends heavily on front-end commitments by all involved to try to make them work.
It’s impossible to know with new systems exactly how much time, effort, cost, will be involved and even new innovations have limits. The Healthy Indiana Plan, for instance, doesn’t nearly cover all of the uninsured. But it does cover many more than are currently helped.
For the past few months, FSSA has been actively engaging non profits and community groups to increase access to its telephone- and computer-based services (V-CAN). It’s impossible to know the impact of this service on the non profit sites. Will it take valuable resources and staff time to help clients access government services? Or will it enhance a non profit service provider’s ability to work more holistically with those they already serve?
As United Way’s CAN manager and I have visited with local organizations, we have been met with more than a little trepidation. Will United Way’s CAN create more administrative work for organizations? Will there be guaranteed funding after the first year? Will other key partners join in? The Vision Council, in proposing CAN, on the other hand, asked: Will it save organizations and their clients time by reducing duplicative intakes and paperwork? Will it help organizations provide more long- term developmental services to clients? Will it help our community identify gaps in services and seek additional services to fill those gaps?
I don’t know the answers to any of these questions, but what do we have to lose, after all, by approaching new conditions with a positive outlook? I can’t say with all certainty that any of these new models will “work.” But I believe that they have a better chance if we focus on our “what ifs” on the possibility that they actually might.
Isn’t a positive outcome the best outcome? What if change really is good?
Nancy Vaughan is president of United Way of Madison County Inc.
Columns
Related Photos
Discussion
NANCY VAUGHAN: Prudent judgments take time
- Columns
-
-
Verna Davis: Church and state — separation or silence?
It’s time we realize, as Charles J. Chaput says, that “exiling religion from civic debates separates government from morality...That road leads to politics without character.” It’s time we realize that it’s time to speak up. The future of our country depends on our doing just that.
-
Heather Bremer: Can Smith cash in on another Big Willie Weekend?
After yet another four-year break, Will Smith once again ventures into waters of the summertime box office with today’s debut of “Men in Black III.” Luckily for Big Willie, it’s the first weekend in ages that won’t be ruled by “The Avengers” … probably.
-
Susan Miller: Looking for a summer vacation vocation
Summer vacation is often a synonym for summer vocation, particularly for teenagers.
-
Jim Bailey: Amazing races keep things lively for family in May
Used to be when you spoke of a race in May, the Indianapolis 500 came to mind. For our family this year that will be an afterthought.
-
Primus Mootry: The Great Divide continues in the U.S.
Last Saturday, at a South Carolina GOP fundraiser attended by a thousand people, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., labeled President Barack Obama as the most “divisive figure in modern American history.” Sen. Rubio is certainly entitled to that opinion, but that’s all it is — an opinion.
-
Emmett Dulaney: Today’s actions hurt tomorrow
I have no recollection of why, but for some reason when we were kids my brother could not stand Catfish Hunter.
-
Bill Stanczykiewicz: Managing disagreements can be teens' gifts for Mom and Dad
New research suggests that teenagers who are allowed to disagree with their parents are more likely to resist negative peer pressure and avoid dangerous behaviors such as drug and alcohol use.
-
Scott Underwood: Good news plays role in journalism
The refrain from readers is almost constant in the careers of serious community journalists: You guys print too much bad news and ignore the good news.
-
Charo Boyd: Social Security serves wounded warriors, families
It’s an American tradition to pay tribute to the men and women of the Armed Forces each Memorial Day — especially honoring those who have made the ultimate sacrifice while serving our country.
-
Maureen Hayden: Readers say it best in response to column about primary
In a recent column, I posed a question about why only 19 percent of Indiana’s 4 million voters cast a ballot in the May primary. I promised not to chastise anyone who would ’fess up to not voting.
I’ll keep part of the promise: I won’t do the scolding, but will let someone else heap on a bit of shame. - More Columns Headlines
-
NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz
Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp
Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium
50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning
Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House
Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami
Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window
Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station
Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach
CEO Salaries Become Sore Issue in Labor Disputes
Raw Video: Fight Erupts in Ukrainian Parliament
Texan Ranchers Remain Wary of Drought
Raw Video: Soldiers Plant Flags at Arlington
Police: Man Arrested in Etan Patz Disappearance
NYC Protests: the Revolution Will Be Scripted
Chicago U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald Resigns
Neighbors of Etan Patz's Suspect: It's Shocking
Gulf Fishermen Reel From Seafood Troubles
Stuntman Makes Skydive Without Parachute in UK
Raw Video: Bride Who Faked Cancer Released
