The tragic events earlier this month at Fort Hood, Texas, prompted me to reflect on my own experiences when I was stationed at that sprawling military post four and a half decades ago.
It was a different world then. The enemy was half a world in either direction, or so we thought. Security was relatively lax; you could come and go at any of several gates with no questions asked. Incoming cars were never checked unless there was an alert. We were supposed to carry passes or leave papers on us whenever we left post, but we rarely did.
That in spite of the fact Fort Hood then housed two armored divisions considered combat-ready members of the Strategic Army Corps (STRAC, always spelled with a lightning bolt through the A).
Of course, trouble carried a much lower profile in those days, civilian or military. Certainly nothing occurred at Fort Hood to compare with the 13 dead and 43 wounded, allegedly at the hand of an Army psychiatrist, reportedly a militant Muslim, who is believed to have gone over the edge after receiving deployment orders for Afghanistan.
The closest thing would have been the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of President John F. Kennedy some 75 miles north of Fort Hood in Dallas. All scheduled activity was suspended for the weekend on that shocking occasion.
The military in those days was a mix of racial and ethnic backgrounds with education levels ranging from high school dropouts to college graduates. Unlike today, when everyone in uniform has at sometime or other decided the service posed a suitable career opportunity, a large proportion including yours truly were there because they had received a draft notice or had opted to enlist to avoid the draft.
Naturally there was a level of dissatisfaction. But most of it was a regret, to some degree unavoidable, at having to be there at all. Rarely did we see anyone strike out against their fellow soldiers, maybe fearing the consequences would be worse than the existing situation.
In those days, though our units included just about every ethnic background, I never knowingly came in contact with anyone of the Islamic faith, let alone anyone with terrorist leanings. Terrorism was regarded as something the Viet Cong conducted in the rice paddies and river deltas and prison camps of Vietnam, which was just then heating up as the chief U.S. military preoccupation.
I’m certain security is tighter these days at the Fort Hood gates, even before the infamous episode earlier this month. I imagine bumper registration stickers, printed orders and IDs are scrutinized before those entering are routinely waved past the checkpoints.
One would be hard-pressed to believe such an event could happen on a heavily fortified military base. Sadly, it goes to show that anyone with the twisted motivation and the means to cause harm to others can do so if they want to badly enough.
Jim Bailey’s column appears on Wednesday. He can be reached by e-mail at jameshenrybailey@earth link.net.
Columns
Jim Bailey: It was different at Fort Hood in those days
I was stationed at that sprawling military post found and a half decades ago
- Columns
-
-
Verna Davis: Church and state — separation or silence?
It’s time we realize, as Charles J. Chaput says, that “exiling religion from civic debates separates government from morality...That road leads to politics without character.” It’s time we realize that it’s time to speak up. The future of our country depends on our doing just that.
-
Heather Bremer: Can Smith cash in on another Big Willie Weekend?
After yet another four-year break, Will Smith once again ventures into waters of the summertime box office with today’s debut of “Men in Black III.” Luckily for Big Willie, it’s the first weekend in ages that won’t be ruled by “The Avengers” … probably.
-
Susan Miller: Looking for a summer vacation vocation
Summer vacation is often a synonym for summer vocation, particularly for teenagers.
-
Jim Bailey: Amazing races keep things lively for family in May
Used to be when you spoke of a race in May, the Indianapolis 500 came to mind. For our family this year that will be an afterthought.
-
Primus Mootry: The Great Divide continues in the U.S.
Last Saturday, at a South Carolina GOP fundraiser attended by a thousand people, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., labeled President Barack Obama as the most “divisive figure in modern American history.” Sen. Rubio is certainly entitled to that opinion, but that’s all it is — an opinion.
-
Emmett Dulaney: Today’s actions hurt tomorrow
I have no recollection of why, but for some reason when we were kids my brother could not stand Catfish Hunter.
-
Bill Stanczykiewicz: Managing disagreements can be teens' gifts for Mom and Dad
New research suggests that teenagers who are allowed to disagree with their parents are more likely to resist negative peer pressure and avoid dangerous behaviors such as drug and alcohol use.
-
Scott Underwood: Good news plays role in journalism
The refrain from readers is almost constant in the careers of serious community journalists: You guys print too much bad news and ignore the good news.
-
Charo Boyd: Social Security serves wounded warriors, families
It’s an American tradition to pay tribute to the men and women of the Armed Forces each Memorial Day — especially honoring those who have made the ultimate sacrifice while serving our country.
-
Maureen Hayden: Readers say it best in response to column about primary
In a recent column, I posed a question about why only 19 percent of Indiana’s 4 million voters cast a ballot in the May primary. I promised not to chastise anyone who would ’fess up to not voting.
I’ll keep part of the promise: I won’t do the scolding, but will let someone else heap on a bit of shame. - More Columns Headlines
-




