The two most emotionally charged words in the Indiana General Assembly this session aren’t “property taxes” or “school funding.”
The two words are “puppy mills.”
There are an estimated 800 to 1,500 operations in Indiana that produce pups for sale, estimates state Rep. Linda Lawson, D-Hammond. The only oversight group for commercial breeders is the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which registers those who sell to pet stores. Only 92 Hoosier breeders are registered.
Lawson’s House Bill 1468 would ban abusive mills and regulate commercial breeders. Initially, the bill would have allowed a person to breed 10 litters a year before being classified as a “commercial breeder” who would have to be licensed by the state and subject to inspections. Commercial breeders would be those who have 20 or more breeding females or those not spayed.
State laws for animal cruelty would also be easier to enforce under her original proposal.
But the bill has been dogged by changes as it goes through the Statehouse. Smart-thinking legislators aren’t going to be perceived as voting against the bill, but they’re more than willing to tinker with it. The Senate stripped some references to neglect and limits on the number of females that could be bred. A compromise between the Senate and House has to be reached by a conference committee by April 29 before heading to the governor.
The bill arises through efforts by the Humane Society of the United States in 33 states to put a leash on the dog breeding industry. And that’s OK with us.
Indiana cannot allow dogs to be bred in kennels with deplorable conditions.
The American Kennel Club has asked for opposition to the bill, saying that a limit on the number of dogs that an irresponsible owner has will not make him or her a better owner. The AKC encourages stronger cruelty language and an enforcement to cover all dog owners. By limiting the number of dogs for a breeder, there is a sense that breeders would be forced to send additional dogs to shelters. We think good breeders are more responsible and will ensure that their dogs will be placed with responsible owners.
Even the Indiana Farm Bureau has chimed in. They note that the bill worries livestock producers because the Humane Society has an ‘anti-meat’ and ‘anti-livestock’ agenda. The next step, they fear, is regulating the treatment of animals at livestock farms. They note that using the term “puppy mill” is a pejorative term used by those who opposed commercial dog breeding.
Anytime there’s a public discussion of intolerable conditions surrounding the rearing of a pet, the emotions flow. That is the case here.
The bill may not specifically solve the problem of reckless individual dog breeders and it doesn’t address conditions in shelters and rescue organizations.
But it begins to address the concerns of thousands of dog lovers in this state and particularly in the Madison County community. Dirty, overcrowded kennels and animal abuse do not produce good pets. Those conditions have created the term “puppy mill” even though we know there are decent and respectable breeders.
It is only reasonable that the legislature reach a compromise that penalizes animal cruelty and protects animals from careless breeders.
In summary
The Indiana legislature must reach a compromise to regulate dog breeders
Editorials
Editorial: Regulation needed to control 'puppy mills'
- Editorials
-
-
Editorial: If bullying tale is true, APA right to release headmaster
The recent accusations leveled against the headmaster at Anderson Preparatory Academy illustrate how bullying can be perpetuated by administrators who become enablers.
-
Editorial: Get permission before school pranks
Anderson High School decided to show some solidarity with their Cascade peers and filled up the school with post-it notes, all in good fun. This prank was also done after hours but with a big difference: The students had requested and received permission to imitate Cascade.
-
You Said It: About fundraiser, missing woman, building preservation
Each Monday, The Herald Bulletin publishes “You Said It,” a compilation of reader comments from www.theheraldbulletin.com.
-
Editorial: Memorial Day helps put face on wounded warriors
This is the perfect weekend to thank a veteran, an active duty service member or a wounded warrior for his or her service. Our positive, encouraging response goes a long way in defining our society.
-
Editorial: Honor those who fought, and celebrate our freedom
This weekend, keep in mind the reason for Memorial Day — to remember those who have been so important in our lives, especially those who made the supreme sacrifice in military service.
-
Editorial: Governor candidates offer conservatism, moderation
The jockeying for position has begun in what is basically a two-horse gubernatorial race. Each offers voters a legitimate option. The November outcome may offer a simple referendum on the mindset of voters: Are they most persuaded by Mike Pence’s conservatism or by John Gregg’s moderation?
-
Editorial: Keep up the chorus against the landfill
Occupy Anderson has joined the ever-growing chorus against the proposed Mallard Lake landfill. Sam Mudd, a member of Occupy, is taking his studies on how the landfill might pollute Anderson’s water to areas of the county to drum up support against the landfill.
-
Editorial: Find a buyer for former school or tear it down
If a buyer wants the former Pendleton Heights Middle School, fine, but put no more taxpayer money into it.
-
Editorial: Libraries must adapt to serve communities
Certainly, the Friends of the Anderson Public Library needs space to store and sell used books, records, DVDs and other material. But library supporters and staff must be flexible in this ever-changing world to keep public facilities relevant.
-
You Said It: About Walking Men, the Queen of Disco and settled lawsuits
Each Monday, The Herald Bulletin publishes “You Said It,” a compilation of reader comments from www.theheraldbulletin.com.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
Editorial: If bullying tale is true, APA right to release headmaster
