By JENNIFER GATES
First, I’d like to respond by saying to Andy Absher: everyone picks and chooses quotations. It doesn’t matter if one is “liberal” or “conservative,” “Christian” or “Muslim” or “Jewish,” or any other label. Second, one cannot possibly be expected to include every quotation or every thought on religion and government into one 250-word letter to the editor. You set up an impossible expectation with comments about using “one quotation,” Andy. However, I will point out that I at least included citations for my quotations so that others could look them up on their own. Third, I would like to point out that most of your letter was centered on a character attack, which is exactly the kind of hateful thing I was arguing against in my original letter.
Fourth, please look up Everson versus Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947). In the words of Justice Hugo Black: “The ‘establishment of religion’ clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the federal government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between church and state,’” 330 U.S. 1, 15-16. The Supreme Court of the United States interpreted separation of church and state, as you have just read, to mean that the federal and state governments cannot “pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another.” That includes Christianity, since Christianity is a religion. This is the precedent by which the Supreme Court has been ruling for decades.
Furthermore, James Madison may have started out being against any amendments to the Constitution, but he later went on not only to draft the first 10 amendments but also to become known as the father of the Bill of Rights. He became convinced that a Bill of Rights was necessary, although he wished for it to be added into the main body of the Constitution rather than being seen as an attachment to the Constitution. (For more information on James Madison, please check out his biography at www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/jm4.html and/or http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761576510/Madison_James.html.)
And finally, what I said originally is that we need to refrain from engaging in religious hatred and from creating laws framed by one religion to govern people of many different religions. Even James Madison would have agreed with that, and our Supreme Court has continued to uphold this view to this very day.
Jennifer Gates is an Anderson resident.
Letters
VIEWPOINT: Refrain from engaging in religious hatred
- Letters
-
-
Letter: Source of inequality is not economic
The truth of the collapse of a living-wage economy for working-class America is a social catastrophe and, increasingly, a severe embarrassment to free-market ideology.
-
Letter: America following road to tyranny
Global elitists behind our government have methodically been guiding our government toward the New World Order.
-
Letter: Let’s work through the problems
On May 14 I attended the county council meeting in hopes that I could understand what is happening in the legislative branch of our Madison County government. What I saw was politics at its worst and I cannot applaud either party.
-
Letter: Columnist Brown ignores truth
It’s hard to understand why The Herald Bulletin carries columns by Susan Stamper Brown, who has such a blatant disregard for truth in her conservative propaganda.
-
Letter: Taxpayers should thank the ‘few’
Are those who worry about the loss of the wheel tax concerned about the roads or about their jobs? Most of them could care less about people’s needs.
-
Letter: Government officials should answer to us
We, the people, have allowed government officials to lead us into the crazy one world order. But, is it working? Well, look at the results.
-
Viewpoint: Schools, volunteers reach out to pre-kindergartners, parents
On behalf of Born Learning Connection as service of the United Way of Madison County, I would like to thank all Madison County elementary schools for their generous support in making Blast Off to Kindergarten a countywide success.
-
Letter: Retired autoworkers appreciate loyalty
Let the voters of Madison County know if you are against Democrats, or if you give money to the election of Republicans, who are hell-bent on destroying our jobs, paychecks and unions. We don’t support these bums.
-
Letter: Don’t lie about laying an egg
The subject of this letter is “laying,” the word in the English language most frequently used incorrectly, and poor little “lying,” the word most ignored.
-
Letter: New laws could halt nepotism, cronyism
Millions in Hoosier tax dollars are wasted daily by inept people in our government who were hired through cronyism, nepotism and political favoritism.
- More Letters Headlines
-
Letter: Source of inequality is not economic
