Legislation co-sponsored by Mike Pence, who represents the Anderson area in the House of Representatives, is known as the media-shield bill.
Using its broader applications, it could be called the public-shield bill, because that is precisely what it is intended to do — shield the public interest from overaggressive courts that would force media representatives to reveal their sources.
The bill is designed to help journalists, including those working online, probe potential wrongdoing in public affairs by protecting the identity of whistle-blowers who have inside knowledge of unethical or illegal activity but fear reprisals if their names are used. The legislation was approved Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee.
Thirty-two states, including Indiana, have laws protecting journalists from being forced to reveal unnamed sources, but the nation needs an overarching law that extends the same protection to investigative journalists everywhere. Many journalists take their mission seriously enough to flirt with a jail sentence in the protection of sources. But many sources would clam up if they knew the journalist would have to choose between jail time and following a court order.
Not surprisingly, the Bush administration opposes the media-shield bill, arguing that it could compromise national security by protecting sources who divulge government secrets, military plans and other sensitive information.
There is a balance to be struck between the public’s right to know and the government’s duty to protect the public. This bill includes language that may tilt the balance too far in the direction of security interests. It stipulates that reporters would not be protected from court orders under certain conditions:
- All reasonable alternative sources have been exhausted.
- Investigators have sound reason to believe the information withheld by the journalist is critical to solve a criminal case.
- The information is critical to the completion of a civil case.
- The information is essential to preventing a terrorist attack, bodily harm or death.
- The information is essential in identifying someone who has exposed trade secrets.
Some argue that the media-shield bill is not necessary because courts have clearly established that journalists and their sources are routinely protected from intrusive subpoenas. But recent cases clearly demonstrate the need for federal protection. Chief among them is the 85-day imprisonment in 2005 of Judith Miller, the New York Times reporter who at first refused to divulge the identity of White House administrators who gave her information about CIA operative Valerie Plame.
Though it is not perfect, the media-shield law is a necessary measure to protect journalists like Miller and, more importantly, the public’s right to know.
Opinion
EDITORIAL: Media-shield bill necessary, though not ideal
- Opinion
-
-
Editorial: Get permission before school pranks
Anderson High School decided to show some solidarity with their Cascade peers and filled up the school with post-it notes, all in good fun. This prank was also done after hours but with a big difference: The students had requested and received permission to imitate Cascade.
-
Maureen Hayden: Readers weigh in on low voter turnout
A couple of columns ago, I posed a question about why most Indiana polling places on primary election day had so few customers.
-
You Said It: About fundraiser, missing woman, building preservation
Each Monday, The Herald Bulletin publishes “You Said It,” a compilation of reader comments from www.theheraldbulletin.com.
-
Scott Underwood: Help us with book about local athletes
Over the years, Madison County has been blessed with more than its share of extraordinary athletes. Through their feats on the field of play, they’ve brought us excitement and inspiration.
-
Editorial: Memorial Day helps put face on wounded warriors
This is the perfect weekend to thank a veteran, an active duty service member or a wounded warrior for his or her service. Our positive, encouraging response goes a long way in defining our society.
-
Editorial: Honor those who fought, and celebrate our freedom
This weekend, keep in mind the reason for Memorial Day — to remember those who have been so important in our lives, especially those who made the supreme sacrifice in military service.
-
Editorial: Governor candidates offer conservatism, moderation
The jockeying for position has begun in what is basically a two-horse gubernatorial race. Each offers voters a legitimate option. The November outcome may offer a simple referendum on the mindset of voters: Are they most persuaded by Mike Pence’s conservatism or by John Gregg’s moderation?
-
Editorial: Keep up the chorus against the landfill
Occupy Anderson has joined the ever-growing chorus against the proposed Mallard Lake landfill. Sam Mudd, a member of Occupy, is taking his studies on how the landfill might pollute Anderson’s water to areas of the county to drum up support against the landfill.
-
Letter: Public should have say on library space
As taxpayers, does the public have no say-so what happens with their tax dollars? With some proper schedule management, those existing meeting rooms can fulfill everyone’s needs.
-
Letter: Election fraud tales turn voters away
Columnist Maureen Hayden asked, “Why did 3 million Hoosiers choose not to vote?” She gave a few reasons but I can think of another one.
How about election fraud? - More Opinion Headlines
-
