We believe: Something is better than nothing when it comes to a public smoking ordinance.
The Anderson City Council recently voted down an attempt at a smoking ordinance in the city because the law didn’t go far enough.
Well, all life is about compromise. As the Rolling Stones once sang, “You can’t always get what you want, but sometimes you get what you need.” The council dropped the ball, and the anti-smoking group that cheered the ordinance’s defeat was too unyielding to see the relative benefits of having a law in place.
City Councilman Art Pepelea, who was all for the ordinance, said it best: “I’m shocked and astonished that we have people in the community who would rather have nothing than have something.”
Councilman Rodney Chamberlain, who voted against the ordinance, took the attitude of the anti-smokers when he said, “We’re either going to have a non-smoking community or we’re going to have a smoking community.”
All or nothing. So Anderson got nothing.
There were many exemptions to the ordinance such as private residences, hotel rooms set aside for smokers, taverns, fraternal clubs and designated smoking areas at businesses to name a few. One was too many for the comprehensive ban group.
Councilman Ollie Dixon voted against the ordinance because it infringed on the rights of businesses.
Pepelea wanted an ordinance to protect children from secondhand smoke. But those against the ban want all workers to be protected. Realistically speaking, people are going to smoke even if the city hires a butt patrol to walk around carrying squirt guns. But where they smoke is a public concern and can be regulated, even if smoking itself can’t be altogether abolished in the city.
The perils of secondhand smoke are well-documented. Many communities have passed strict smoking ordinances. Many restaurants have taken it upon themselves to ban smoking. An ordinance, even one that is not comprehensive, is a step in the right direction because it raises awareness and protects children.
Also, many communities have found ordinances forbidding or limiting smoking in public places to be a boon to economic development. Smoking ordinances suggest a city is concerned with quality-of-life issues such as providing a healthy, clean environment.
If the ordinance had passed, it could’ve been amended as needed. However, Kareesa Knight-Wilkerson, executive director of the Healthy, Tobacco-Free Madison County, said that wouldn’t happen. Why the defeatist attitude? Why not accept the compromise and work to refine it?
But no. The all-or-nothing crowd decided that smoking should continue everywhere instead of somewhere. Where is the logic in that?
Representative government is founded on the concept of individuals representing different constituents coming together on common issues. There have to be compromises. Apparently some people haven’t learned that yet.
Opinion
EDITORIAL: Council should’ve passed smoking ban
- Opinion
-
-
Editorial: Get permission before school pranks
Anderson High School decided to show some solidarity with their Cascade peers and filled up the school with post-it notes, all in good fun. This prank was also done after hours but with a big difference: The students had requested and received permission to imitate Cascade.
-
Maureen Hayden: Readers weigh in on low voter turnout
A couple of columns ago, I posed a question about why most Indiana polling places on primary election day had so few customers.
-
You Said It: About fundraiser, missing woman, building preservation
Each Monday, The Herald Bulletin publishes “You Said It,” a compilation of reader comments from www.theheraldbulletin.com.
-
Scott Underwood: Help us with book about local athletes
Over the years, Madison County has been blessed with more than its share of extraordinary athletes. Through their feats on the field of play, they’ve brought us excitement and inspiration.
-
Editorial: Memorial Day helps put face on wounded warriors
This is the perfect weekend to thank a veteran, an active duty service member or a wounded warrior for his or her service. Our positive, encouraging response goes a long way in defining our society.
-
Editorial: Honor those who fought, and celebrate our freedom
This weekend, keep in mind the reason for Memorial Day — to remember those who have been so important in our lives, especially those who made the supreme sacrifice in military service.
-
Editorial: Governor candidates offer conservatism, moderation
The jockeying for position has begun in what is basically a two-horse gubernatorial race. Each offers voters a legitimate option. The November outcome may offer a simple referendum on the mindset of voters: Are they most persuaded by Mike Pence’s conservatism or by John Gregg’s moderation?
-
Editorial: Keep up the chorus against the landfill
Occupy Anderson has joined the ever-growing chorus against the proposed Mallard Lake landfill. Sam Mudd, a member of Occupy, is taking his studies on how the landfill might pollute Anderson’s water to areas of the county to drum up support against the landfill.
-
Letter: Public should have say on library space
As taxpayers, does the public have no say-so what happens with their tax dollars? With some proper schedule management, those existing meeting rooms can fulfill everyone’s needs.
-
Letter: Election fraud tales turn voters away
Columnist Maureen Hayden asked, “Why did 3 million Hoosiers choose not to vote?” She gave a few reasons but I can think of another one.
How about election fraud? - More Opinion Headlines
-
