FORT WAYNE, Ind. (AP) — State officials have decided to fight a lawsuit challenging a rule banning high-fenced hunting preserves in Indiana.
The Department of Natural Resources had entered into settlement negotiations in August 2006, but more than a year later, the legal wrangling continues, The Journal Gazette reported in a story Thursday.
The issue started festering in the late 1990s when several facilities sprang up under the guise of a game breeder’s license. The owners charged thousands of dollars for hunters to come in and shoot deer bred specifically for large antlers.
In 2005, then-DNR Director Kyle Hupfer said he would implement an emergency — and later permanent — rule banning the operations. The intent was to clarify current regulations and establish new ones regarding what some call canned hunting — paying to shoot deer behind fences.
Hundreds of deer farms in Indiana have white-tailed deer and other animals under a game breeder’s permit, but only a few allow hunting.
Hupfer determined that while the permit allows for the possession, breeding and sale of white-tailed deer, it does not authorize the hunting or purposeful killing of them.
Preserve owners disagreed, saying former DNR officials gave them permission to open up.
Rodney Bruce, the owner of Whitetail Bluff near the southern Indiana town of Corydon, sued in 2005 and obtained a court injunction preventing the DNR from enforcing the ban on his property.
The General Assembly tried to intervene in 2006 but failed, which prompted negotiations to start in earnest.
The idea was to allow existing preserves to continue operating for about 10 more years so they could recoup their investment. Various versions of the settlement required the owners to admit the activity is illegal and to cease at the end of the established window.
Nine more preserves or owners were added to the lawsuit as plaintiffs so they could sign onto any agreement reached. They now have the protection of the same initial injunction against enforcement that Bruce received.
Settlement negotiations ceased after Robert Carter became the new DNR director when Hupfer left the position in December.
Adam Warnke, the DNR’s deputy director and chief counsel, told The Journal Gazette that the talks were stopped as “we determined that an acceptable settlement wasn’t possible, so we elected to fight the lawsuit.”
Doug Allman of the Indiana Deer Hunters Association is pleased about the agency’s changed stance on the hunting preserves.
“They just aren’t popular, and the Michael Vick thing isn’t helping,” he said, referring to dogfighting charges against the NFL star. “People just aren’t willing to accept these preserves.”
Preserve owners have filed a motion in Harrison Circuit Court asking the judge to enforce the proposed settlement agreement even though it was not officially signed. The state is seeking to have that motion dismissed.
Arguments on the issue were scheduled for Nov. 7.
“I think our chances are pretty darn good,” said William Moyer, an attorney for Bruce. “I have cited several state and federal cases all that approved the enforcement of oral settlements. The fact that this was never signed, in my opinion, really doesn’t matter much.”
Hupfer disagrees, saying the two sides never came close to making the agreement official. He said one of the reasons the DNR backed off was research finding the state is not allowed to enter into an agreement not to enforce a state rule or law.
Warnke said that while the DNR is prohibited from enforcing the preserve restrictions on those involved in the lawsuit, the agency has stopped at least two startups of similar preserves in the past year.
State News
State decides to fight lawsuit over hunting preserves
- State News
-
-
Pats tats are sign of pride for Indy police officer
There’s no love lost in this Super Bowl host city for the New England Patriots, but it’s no crime to be a Pats fan. Just ask Indianapolis police Officer Mike Andresen.
-
Wireless infrastructure to be tested under heavy demand
The throngs of fans who’ll descend on Lucas Oil Stadium for Sunday’s Super Bowl game may experience the most “connected” game in the event’s history, thanks to an estimated $100 million investment in technology infrastructure in and around the stadium.
-
Indiana election chief's voter fraud trial nears end
The political future of Indiana's top election official, and potentially his freedom, rested Friday with jurors, who were deliberating late into the evening in his voter fraud trial.
-
Man fatally shot, two Muncie police officers injured
A witness says he saw two police officers involved in a shootout with a man in a convenient store parking lot, saying it lasted about 30 seconds.
-
Cancer charity confronts backlash over grant cuts
The renowned breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure faced an escalating backlash Thursday over its decision to cut breast screening grants to Planned Parenthood. Some of Komen's local affiliates are openly upset, including all seven in California, and at least one top official has quit, reportedly in protest.
-
Brady throws NFL, feds curveball
Super Bowl officials ended up with news stories Thursday that led with Super Bowl-bound quarterback Tom Brady admitting he watched last year’s NFL championship game on an illegal website.
-
Fan Dome brings Xbox under the bubble
When it comes to marketing, Microsoft pulled out all the stops for Super Bowl XLVI. Witness the Fan Dome, the inflated bubble containing Xbox 360 Kinect games, plenty of room for players to jump up and down and do their moves, and some pumping music to elevate the experience.
-
Feds seize nearly $5M in phony Super Bowl swag
Federal officials say authorities have seized nearly $5 million worth of phony Super Bowl sportswear and merchandise in a nationwide sweep.
-
Ind. lawmakers seek to protect Fort Wayne base
The commander of Indiana Air National Guard's 122nd Fighter Wing says the base in Fort Wayne is awaiting word on whether it will be one of military bases the Pentagon closes.
-
Super security goes into place for Super Bowl
Law enforcement officials charged with Super Bowl security are taking extraordinary measures to prevent a terrorist attack, but they’re also working to keep the event from being a field day for common criminals.
- More State News Headlines
-
